On Track
May 31, 2010 by tdomf_55091
Filed under Integrations
I hate numbers.
I have learned efficiency tracking through Statistical Process Control in manufacturing operations. It came easily to me once I dropped the numbers and looked at the overall picture as a large puzzle, an actual picture from the creative side of my brain. Numbers have always been an in complete alternate “language” to me to define parameters that limit expansion (I.E. creativity). I “genius” scientist with a blackboard full of numbers and symbols which no one else can understand is useless to others unless put into practical application and tangible goods/services. One of my greater interests has always been what is now commonly called quantum physics. Upon researching the latest cutting edge developments I realized that I intuitively knew these things at around 3 to 5 years of age, but they were basically “taught out” of me but anti-civilization and public schools as being nonsense. Now “modern science” is “discovering” things I already knew. For example Einstein’s E=MC(2) is hogwash. Although practical as a model (metaphor)to lead to further understanding, a much simpler and more accurate equation (of my own) is D=T. Although seemingly oversimplified, when fully explained my equation will outperform E=MC(2) ten-fold. Again, this is just one example.
On another note, I have research evidence and strong theoretical evidence
of the nature of aging, life existence and mortality/immortality which may run a close parallel to stem cell and genetic research, but leads a different path to a very possible solution. Most of the stress of anti-civilization can be the literal cause of death, but genetic programming from the distant past is a large conflict for physical longevity, as well as other factors which are very well hidden and suppressed in the anti-civilization.
The ideas I am citing now are merely teasers, I have been a Neothink thinker most of my life and had TSM’s many times, but never became wealthy without a system to put it into forward motion for any length of time. My current focus is on a very large picture, trying to integrate massive quantities of historical data with modern economics and technology and theoretical physics as a resolution to repeating the same cycles (doomed to repeat them because of not understanding them) and advancing the nature of humanity permanently. The information about bicameral thinking is very helpful in integrating the larger picture.
Beyond that I have very little comment at this time.